Raw Milk: Branan and Day Present on Cow Sharing Agreements
El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.
Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.
English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.
Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.Collapse ▲
Andrew Branan, Extension Assistant Professor with the NC State University Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, along with Marti Day, Extension Dairy Specialist, gave a brief presentation regarding North Carolina’s de facto permission to dispense unpasteurized milk under a cow-sharing agreement. The presentation, delivered at Carolina Farm Stewardship Association’s Annual Organic Livestock and Commodities Conference, outlined health risk concerns and legal issues surrounding such agreements for consumers and producers.
Branan’s portion of the presentation can be found here: Legal Issues Related to Cow Share Arrangements in North Carolina
Via small changes to North Carolina’s prohibition on the sale of raw milk in the Farm Act of 2018, unpasteurized milk dispensed to an owner (or partial owner) of a lactating animal is not considered a sale of milk under North Carolina law, and is therefore not regulated by the state. Unpasteurized milk sold to others without an ownership of the lactating animal must still be conspicuously labeled as “pet milk” under proper N.C. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services permit. NCDA&CS still retains the authority to respond to public health emergencies.
Branan and Day discussed a number of questions concerning the new law in relation to agister agreements – the agreement between the “farmer” and the partial “owner(s)” of the animal that includes the dispensing of milk from the animal – as well as potential farmer liability (and contractual waiver) for injury to a consumer receiving unpasteurized milk under such agreement. Such agreements usually involve fees for such service. Branan discussed legal cases concerning agister agreements in other states where courts found such agreements to be disguised sales of raw milk.
Both Branan and Day agreed that the test of such agreements will have to wait until such time there is a health emergency or injury giving rise to a potential claim for liability, or perhaps a contract disagreement over services – and milk – provided by the agister to a partial owner of the lactating animal in question.